Division Point U25B Announcement

Discussion in 'Diesel Locomotives' started by Rick McClellan, Dec 10, 2009.

  1. Rick McClellan

    Rick McClellan 2009 Engineer of the Year

    I just received an email from Canadian Model Trains indicating that Division Point will release two Frisco U25B units. Unit #803 will be the high hood version in black and yellow. Unit #827 will be in orange and white. Prices are TBD which always scares me.

    Here is the url for the announcement.

    http://www.divisionpoint.com/GE_U25B_catalog.html

    Start saving now.

    Mom and Dad: Send peanut butter.
     
  2. Sirfoldalot

    Sirfoldalot Frisco.org Supporter Frisco.org Supporter

    Rick .. I think your gonna have to switch to Walmart "Great Value" brand. :D
     
  3. meteor910

    meteor910 2009 Engineer of the Year Staff Member Frisco.org Supporter

    Wooo! - gotta get one of those b/y high-nose U-boats. I can live with the two Stewarts for the low-nose U25b's, but long for one of the somewhat homely hi-nosers.

    Nice view of the top of 827 in its pic. And, look at the neat PT-boats following in the consists in both the 803 and 827 pics.

    Ken
    U-boat lover (achugga chug chug chug achugga chug chug ...........)

    ps - Rick, let's stick with the Peter Pan. We Frisco-folk gotta maintain our standards.
     
  4. FriscoFriend (Bob Hoover RIP 4/12/2018)

    FriscoFriend (Bob Hoover RIP 4/12/2018) Passed Away April 12, 2018 Frisco.org Supporter

    I believe the #827 would fall into the Phase IV class which is the same locomotive due to arrive from Bowser/Stewart in plastic form within the next couple of months. I am choosing to take a wait and see approach to this model as unless they made a last minute change, Stewart has chosen to use an old technique of theirs of mounting the handrails so they go vertically into the top of the running board vs. plugging into the side as all other manufacturers do. In speaking to their rep at the OKC Train Show last December (2008) he said that to have changed it would have added $10-$15 to the MSRP of the locomotive. With standards of fidelity that they are today, I personally believe the extra cost would have been well worth it. He did promise to get the color correct using Atlas as a guide and they will come Tsunami equipped. One can buy a whole fleet of them for the same price as one of the Division Point brass ones!
    What is interesting is the announcement of the high nose version in B&Y. That one will really be unique. To my knowledge, this version was only produced in brass many years ago when detail was in the dark ages compared to today.
     
  5. Sirfoldalot

    Sirfoldalot Frisco.org Supporter Frisco.org Supporter

    Which is the correct way for the handrails to be mounted?
    I see both kinds: some attached to the sides of the sill and some attached to the top.
    Did Frisco have different versions of the U25B?
     
  6. FriscoFriend (Bob Hoover RIP 4/12/2018)

    FriscoFriend (Bob Hoover RIP 4/12/2018) Passed Away April 12, 2018 Frisco.org Supporter

    The handrail stanchions are attached to the side of the frame on this version which is Phase IV. Honestly, before you asked your question, I thought they all were, but after consulting Marre's book it looks like earlier veresions were posts that went down vertically into the frame like I assume the model will be. For reference purposes, look at #815 on the top of page 134 and compare it to #831 on the bottom of page 135.
     
  7. meteor910

    meteor910 2009 Engineer of the Year Staff Member Frisco.org Supporter

    Hmmm. This is supposition, but I'll bet what happened with the Stewart U25b model body shell is as follows:

    Recall the first Stewart U25b had an Athearn drive and chassis, and was the "early" (some call it the "classic") U25b (Phase III?), with the flat short hood, the one piece main windshield, and handrail posts mounted to the top edge of the side walkways. Later, Stewart introduced a second U25b model, this one being the later Phase IV version, which had the sloped short hood, a two piece main windshield, and handrail posts mounted to the side of the frame. It also had a Kato drive and better trucks - much better.

    I have one of each of these, though I bought two of the later Phase IV's (the second one in PRR colors), then built the PRR U25b using the Athearn chassis from the Phase III(?) kit I originally bought. I then sold the PRR, leaving me with both low-nose U25b styles on Kato drives, both undecs. One of these years I'll finish them.

    The only problem with this is that Stewart left the side handrails mounted to the top of the frame on the second (Phase IV) version. They did do the changed windshield and the short hood correctly on both.

    It sounds like they will be using the basics of the Phase IV shell for the new releases.

    On the Frisco, SLSF 808-815 were the "classic" (Phase III?) versions, and came in black & yellow in 1962-1963. SLSF 816-831 were the Phase IV models, and came in red/orange and white, among the first Frisco units to come in those colors new from the factory, in 1965-1966.

    Though I am an EMD locomotive fan, I aways liked the U-boats, on any railroad. I easily recall their sound coming up Rolla Hill: achugga chug chug chug achugga chug chug chug ...... Their turbocharged four-cycle FDL engine had a much different chugging sound than the chant of the two-cycle EMD 567's and 645's (either with a Roots blower (F3,F7,F9,FP7,GP7,E7,E8,GP38,GP38-2,GP15-1) or turbocharged (GP35,GP40-2,SD45,SD40-2,GP50)).

    Ken
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 10, 2009
  8. FriscoFriend (Bob Hoover RIP 4/12/2018)

    FriscoFriend (Bob Hoover RIP 4/12/2018) Passed Away April 12, 2018 Frisco.org Supporter

    Ken:

    I think that your conclusion is right on point. The rep at the OKC Show voluntarily pointed out the flaw and the reason they didn't change it ($10.00-$15.00 extra charge). Personally I wouldn't have known the difference at the time. Upon returning home I mentioned this to Rick McClellan and he verified that it was an issue with the Phase IV model previously produced. They claim they have a new frame and fuel tank so I can't understand why they couldn't make it right?
     
  9. Iantha_Branch

    Iantha_Branch Member

    I've had Peater Pan and Jif and personaly I like Jif better. It's smoother and to me it has a better taste. I guess you guys like Peter Pan because it's cheaper.
     
  10. Sirfoldalot

    Sirfoldalot Frisco.org Supporter Frisco.org Supporter

    OK.... You guys have me totally confused now.:confused:
    Ken, your dissecting of the U-boats was good, but still has me wondering which handrails went with which numbered units?

    Now .. Bob; Separate the Stewart models as to where the handrails are mounted. One of your postings has them on top of the sill - another post says they are on the side.

    I have been shopping e-bay for a loco and I had just as soon try and get the correct one. DP is out of my league I am afraid.

    Any help here is appreciated.

    Right now .. I gotta make a PBJ .. looking at Rick's avatar has caused this. LOL
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 10, 2009
  11. WindsorSpring

    WindsorSpring Member

    Referring to the U-25B Depositions
    http://www.frisco.org/vb/showthread.php?t=886

    there is a discontinuity in time of acquisition between 815 and 816 as well as a gap in construction time. Units up to 815 had handrails mounted into the frame. 816 on had stanchions. Checking photos in the U25B thread will verify this, though 816 through 818 are not represented.
     
  12. meteor910

    meteor910 2009 Engineer of the Year Staff Member Frisco.org Supporter

    Very deep sigh! ..... I give up, you just can't put these things in boxes easily like I want to do.

    After looking at a bunch of Frisco low-nose U25b's, it appears that:

    - The "classic" U25b low-nose units (were they called Phase III?) were SLSF 808-815, (1962-1963). These had the flat short hood, the one-piece windshield, and handrail posts going into the frame at the top edge of the walkway. The Stewart Phase III (?) model is thus accurate for SLSF 808-815.

    - The Phase IV U25b did show up on the Frisco starting with SLSF 816 (1965) through SLSF 831 (1966). They have the two-piece windshield, and the revised handrail stanchions that are mounted on the the side of the frame.

    BUT ..... Phase IV U25b's SLSF 816-823 (1965) have a flat short hood, just like the earlier units! Geez, why did they do this to us?

    Only Phase IV U25b's SLSF 824-831 (1966) have the sloped short hood as I described earlier.

    Thus, the Stewart Phase IV model is correct for SLSF 824-831, except that the Stewart model still has the handrail posts going into the top edge of the side frame, which is incorrect for any Phase IV U25b.

    Perhaps Don and others are right - steam locomotives do make more sense and are easier to understand!

    Ken
     
  13. Sirfoldalot

    Sirfoldalot Frisco.org Supporter Frisco.org Supporter

    Nicely done - Ken.
    That I can relate too!
     
  14. Brad Slone

    Brad Slone Member Frisco.org Supporter

    I have always thought the high nosed 25's where a really neat engine. One that is very difficult to kitbash, seeing them in brass is almost enough to make me consider going back to the late 70's......not!

    Brad
     
  15. mark

    mark Staff Member Staff Member

    Sherrel and Ken,

    The Frisco's U-25-B units fell into 4 production "phases".

    These "phases" or spotting differences included the following major distinguishing features:

    SL-SF 800-807 - Phase Ib
    High front hood, inside handbrake (not visible), vertical corner end steps, cab sub-base with 3 access doors under engineer position, all of the hood access doors are tall, vertical mount (into walkway) side and end handrails, 2 step fuel tank with air tanks at rear inset parallel to frame side sills.

    SL-SF 808-815 - Phase IIa
    Low front hood with minimal forward taper, 1 piece windshield above short hood, wheel type handbrake, inset corner end steps, cab sub-base with 3 access doors under engineer position, all of the hood access doors are tall, vertical mount (into walkways) side and end handrails, long fuel tank with air tanks fore and aft perpendicular to frame side sills.

    SL-SF 816-823 - Phase III
    Low front hood with minimal forward taper, 2 piece windshield above short hood, wheel type handbrake, inset corner end steps, cab sub-base with 2 access doors under engineer position, 4 short hood doors (below exhaust stack) between engine compartment and rear radiator vent, top door latches on tall doors lowered to short door height, side mount (into side and end sills) side and end handrails, long fuel tank with air tanks fore and aft perpendicular to frame side sills.

    SL-SF 824-831 - Phase IV
    Low front hood with increased forward taper, 2 piece windshield above short hood, lever type handbrake, inset corner end steps, cab sub-base with 2 access doors under engineer position, 4 short hood doors (below exhaust stack) between engine compartment and rear radiator vent, top door latches on tall doors lowered to short door height, side mount (into side and end sills) side and end handrails, long fuel tank with air tanks fore and aft perpendicular to frame side sills.

    I have highlighted changes between phases in italics.

    Hope this helps.

    Thanks!

    Mark
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 20, 2009
  16. meteor910

    meteor910 2009 Engineer of the Year Staff Member Frisco.org Supporter

    Very helpful. Thanks Mark! I missed the fact there were three phases between SLSF 808 and 831, not just two. I always just looked quickly at the front window or the short hood and made the call that way. Not that simple!

    Ken
     
  17. Sirfoldalot

    Sirfoldalot Frisco.org Supporter Frisco.org Supporter

    Mark .. WOW .. Thank you so much. I have to start being more observant of the (for lack of a better word) smaller details.

    may I ask - Which phase does the Stewart model (the ones already produced) best represent? Most of the ones I see on Ebay I cannot see closeup details because of not so good photos. I assume that there is not a choice as far as the handrails go - so would like to know what Frisco number I can get the closest to the model.

    Your help is most appreciated - albeit depressing.:D

    Added goof: I think Ken already answered my question.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 12, 2009
  18. Iantha_Branch

    Iantha_Branch Member

    I saw a Stewart U25B at the joplin train show a few weeks ago. It was in in B&Y so I decided to pass it up. It had a low nose, and 1 piece windsheild, so I would guess Phase IIa.
     
  19. WindsorSpring

    WindsorSpring Member

    A good topic for The Meteor, Volume I # 4 would be "...how to convert between the phases to model accurately the U25B number you want."

    Maybe that is too broad a topic. A better strategy would be to start with a specific model, state the phase and number range it most closely represents and then list the steps needed to get it right. Continuing the article, there should be a checklist of steps needed for successful conversion to another phase and number range. Finally, the would-be author should explain why conversion to certain phases would not be worth the effort.

    Another simple topic might be how to convert a model that is otherwise phase III or IV but lacks proper handrails so that it does. Step one, the easy part, "use a Dremel tool to remove the handrails and sand smooth with very fine paper." I will leave it up to others on the list to complete the steps! :)
     
  20. meteor910

    meteor910 2009 Engineer of the Year Staff Member Frisco.org Supporter

    The original HO Stewart U25b (the one with the Athearn drive) is a Phase IIa, good for SLSF 808-815. These came in b/y and were eventually repainted in o/w. They have the flat short hood, the one-piece windshield, and handrail posts that mount into the top of the side frame.

    The later Stewart HO U25b (the one with the Kato drive) is meant to be a Phase IV, for SLSF 824-831. These came in o/w. They have the sloped short hood, the two-piece windshield, and should have handrail posts that mount to the side of the frame. However, Stewart chose to leave the handrail posts as in the earlier model, mounted to the top of the frame, which is incorrect for a Phase IV.

    There really is no correct Stewart model for the Phase III, SLSF 816-823. These came in o/w. You could approximate one by putting the Phase IV Stewart cab on to their Phase IIa model. But, the handrails will still be incorrect. Stewart does (at least they used to) sell parts, so the Phase IV cab may be easy to get.

    From what Bob has reported, it sounds like the new Stewart U25b release, in o/w, will basically use their Phase IV model, with some improvements. These will be close to SLSF 824-831. However, the handrails will still be incorrect in that they mount to the top of the frame.

    Again, thanks to Mark for correctly outlining the Frisco U25b phases. I hope I got it all straight above!

    Ken
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 12, 2009

Share This Page