Genesis F3's

Discussion in 'Diesel Locomotives' started by Frisco2008, Sep 30, 2009.

  1. Frisco2008

    Frisco2008 Member Frisco.org Supporter

    My F3's just arrived!

    Beautiful paint and details.

    Also, the Rivo 60' baggage car arrived also. I'm pleased with it also. (Also, that's about the greatest number of "also's" I've ever used in one posting!)

    Glenn in Tulsa
     
  2. meteor910

    meteor910 2009 Engineer of the Year Staff Member Frisco.org Supporter

    I agree with Glenn - I think the Athearn Genesis F's (not just the Frisco F3's) are about the nicest off-the-shelf HO models of anything.

    Very well done, details specific to the railroad, terrific decoration, and are superb runners to boot. Love that headlight!

    Now, how do we talk Athearn into doing Frisco Genesis F7's in b/y?

    Ken
     
  3. Iantha_Branch

    Iantha_Branch Member

    Or a run of MP15's in O/W
     
  4. mark

    mark Staff Member Staff Member

    Ethan,

    Atlas produced their MP-15 DC lettered for the Frisco in 2006. They produced 4 of the 5 road numbers the Frisco owned. Also, they produced a painted but unnumbered unit (both conventional DC or decoder and sound equipped versions). Please see http://www.atlasrr.com/HOLoco/homp15a.htm.

    The Atlas units may be available on e-Bay, railroad flee markets or possibly some hobby shops.

    Athearn's model is of the MP-15 AC. The Frisco did not own this version of the locomotive.

    The primary exterior spotting feature differences for the MP-15 DC is a front mounted radiator intake similar to the SW-1500. The MP-15 AC has side mounted radiator intakes similar to a GP-15, SD-45T or SD-40T-2 "tunnel motor". Internally the electrical systems featured a generator (DC) or an alternator (AC).

    Hope this helps.

    Thanks!

    Mark
     
  5. Iantha_Branch

    Iantha_Branch Member

    thanks for the info. Didn't realize there was that much of a difference between the MP15AC and DC.
     
  6. Rick McClellan

    Rick McClellan 2009 Engineer of the Year

    If your gonna talk about 'em, you gotta include a photo (or two).

    Ship IT on the Frisco!

    Rick
     

    Attached Files:

  7. yardmaster

    yardmaster Administrator Staff Member Administrator Frisco.org Supporter

    Thanks for the photo, Rick; if it can't be steam, this is not too bad!

    The F units sure looked more aesthetically pleasing in an all-F unit lash-up.

    Best Regards,
     
  8. meteor910

    meteor910 2009 Engineer of the Year Staff Member Frisco.org Supporter

    Speaking of the good looks of an EMD F-unit set ..... It really looked cool when five or six Frisco F's came around the curve at the south end of Pine Street in Rolla chanting in unison while still pulling hard after climbing Rolla Hill!

    Ken
     
  9. Iantha_Branch

    Iantha_Branch Member

    It would be a sight to see. I think the only thing that would top it is to see 6 SD45's climbing dixson hill at full throtle. Talk about a heavonly sound. I have herd something similar an youtube though........
     
  10. meteor910

    meteor910 2009 Engineer of the Year Staff Member Frisco.org Supporter

    Six SD45's working the hill would be a sight to see indeed, but that consist was not allowed on the Frisco. Per ETT #1, dated 10/17/1971:

    "Not more than three (3) 900 series units coupled together, either working and/or being handled in train, will be permitted without separation by unit of less weight or by a car not exceeding 177,000 pounds gross weight."

    As Karl explained, the problem was that more than three SD45's coupled together put too much strain on the rails. Too many curves, hills, and sags on the good old Frisco for all that concentrated weight and horsepower!

    Ken
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 5, 2009
  11. Iantha_Branch

    Iantha_Branch Member

    duh, forgot that. Thanks for the reminder.
     

Share This Page