Frisco mixed train ride in 1965

Discussion in 'General' started by Dennis Hogan, Sep 3, 2024 at 6:43 AM.

  1. Dennis Hogan

    Dennis Hogan Member

  2. Iantha_Branch

    Iantha_Branch Member

    That's a really interesting read. Thanks for sharing.

    I'm surprised to see a VO-1000 sent out of yard duty into local service. I don't think I've seen an example of that before
     
    Ozarktraveler likes this.
  3. Karl

    Karl 2008 Engineer of the Year Frisco.org Supporter

    During that period, VO-1000's, RS-1's and GP-7's were typical.
     
    Ozarktraveler and klrwhizkid like this.
  4. Karl

    Karl 2008 Engineer of the Year Frisco.org Supporter

    The article needs supplementation.

    1. The two baggage cars were entrained for the "sole" purpose of handling chicks from the Booth Hatchery in Clinton. The chicks were handled by the Railway Express Agency, hence the specially equipped baggage cars. More about this... http://www.frisco.org/shipit/index....o-all-aboard-magazine-article-june-1956.3091/
    2. The Clinton Sub, local passenger trains, 20 and 21, were discontinued May 28, 1954.
    3. During October 10, 1959, REA Messenger, Howard Freeman was shot and killed by teenage boys, who were taking potshots at number 59 as it passed Belton.
    http://www.frisco.org/shipit/index....mullen-road-belton-mo-10-10-1959.17/#post-114
    4 The siding remnant mentioned in the article was not the Katy. Besides the Katy remnant, the Frisco also still served a remnant of the Kansas City, Clinton and Springfield, also known as the Leaky Roof. The photo in the article shows number 59 switching the old Leaky Roof. See this for the layout at Harrisonville.
    http://www.frisco.org/shipit/index....ola-subdivision-mp-45-9-kccs.1255/#post-61543
     
  5. klrwhizkid

    klrwhizkid Administrator Staff Member Administrator Frisco.org Supporter

    Iantha_Branch and Ozarktraveler like this.
  6. Coonskin

    Coonskin Member

    Just an observation:

    There appears to be a typo in the caption of the lead photo. In that caption the date is noted as "April 1968". In the other references it's "April 1965".

    I think the April 1965 date is correct.
     
    Iantha_Branch and WindsorSpring like this.

Share This Page