Water Towers - Various Locations - Wood and Steel

Re: Beaumont Water Tower, KS

See this thread for a discussion about Beaumont:

http://www.frisco.org/shipit/index.php?threads/beaumont-ks.1372/

 

I see a pump house and a pumper's dwelling house, but no well house.

 

That is correct, my mistake.

 

To All:

Attached is a picture taken recently of the pump house located at the pond which is south of the tank.

I have seen a plot showing the water lined running from it to the tank.

It is also my understanding that it served the restrooms at the hotel.

 

I don't believe that this is the Frisco pump house.

It was a 16' x 24' structure that was located on the east leg of the wye.

Please see:

http://www.frisco.org/shipit/index.php?attachments/bb_beaumont_pmp_hse_ed-jpg.3740/

 

Karl:

You are more than likely correct as this little building housed an electrical pump and had electrical lines running to it.

That leads me to believe that it was built after the original pump house was dismantled. Up until the recent renovation water was kept in the tank to keep it from caving in. Upon renovation a sleeve of sorts was constructed so that is no longer necessary.

Also I have been told by two former engineers that worked that line that at times during the hot summer months they took on water from a small red hose that protruded from the ground in or next to the pipe base that held the stanchion for the water tank.

 

Closer to my home, the Northern Division, Kansas City Subdivision, Biocourt, KS also had two water tanks.

The water from the river was so muddy, it was pumped into the first tank to settle, then the cleaner water was pumped into the second tank for use by the steam engines. The two tanks had no roofs.

I have a picture of them around here some place.

 

Does anyone have an engineering drawing of the water spout and it's mounting to the Frisco 50,000 gallon water tank?

 

It seems that the Frisco applied an after-market handle to its FM water spouts.

That it what the drawing which may be found at this link depicts.

http://www.frisco.org/shipit/index.php?threads/fairbanks-morse-water-crane-valve-handle.708/

With a little bit of work, one should be able to derive a plausible spout from the drawing.

Unfortunately, the details about how the spout attaches to tank are missing.

 

Even the write up for the listing as an historical building doesn't list how the spout was attached.

I guess the choices are hinged or by chain.

 

When I again scratch build the Beaumont, KS water tank, I'm going to build at least two of them.

The Beaumont, KS water tank never had a spout on it. There was a water crane down by the roundhouse. But I want to put one of the second tank I build. I guess I will build out a wooden rectangular frame. The spout will be hinged at the bottom wooden member with the supply pipe coming out of the bottom of the tank such that when the spout is lowered, it will go into the spout.

Attached to the top of the frame will be two rollers so chains with weights can be attached to the top end of the spout. A rope will hang down from the bottom of the spout so the fireman could lower the spout onto the tender. There will be a second chain or rope going up the side of the tank to a pivot that goes down into the tank to open the water valve.

What do you think?

 

For me, that is probably as good as anything.

Here is a drawing from the C&NW.

 

Oldguy,

Thank you very much, that is just what I was looking for.

I really do not think the railroad makes all that much difference because I think they were pretty standard.

 

Not necessary so.

During the Turn of the Century, prior to 1910, standardization was almost non-existent. Railroads did with what they had. Yeah, certain proven patterns like trestle bents and bridges may have shared characteristics because of proven reliability, but it wasn't until right before WW1 that standards started to take shape.

One thing is certain, you can see certain things consistent with each other.

I too thank Oldguy for posting that.

 

I don't have an entire plan to post, but the following information is from the Frisco standard tank plan of 1898.

Standard 12 post, 12" by 12", hooped, covered tank 24' X 16'.

Bottom of tub 14' above top of rail.

Center of tank 24' from centerline of track.

Discharge spout 10'-8" length, 13"diameter, large end, 10" diameter small end.

Unfortunately there is no drawing or description of how the spout was attached.

Hope this helps,

John

 

There was usually a rope or chain beside the water spout on the water tanks which went to the top of the tank to a arm on a pivot point.

The other end dropped down into the tank to connect to a water valve at the bottom of the tank, just above the discharge pipe leading to the spout.

 

While we are on the subject of water spouts on the Frisco and the free standing one that serviced locomotives in Beaumont, I thought you all might find some interest in the latest addition there.

Local resident Marci Brewer, the lady who led the successful effort to completely restore the tower several years ago, found the vertical part of spout or stanchion back east and got it shipped back to Beaumont and erected in the same spot on the footings of original one.

She hopes to raise the money in the near future to get the other half fabricated out of stainless steel.

 

Not so, according to my plat map of the Beaumont, KS railroad facilities.

The water stand pipe was down by the roundhouse.

It is clearly marked on the map.

 

Richard:

Thanks for the correction.

I just went by what I was told when I went over there and saw it. For what it's worth, I personally wish they would have waited to erect it when they had the other half completed.

My fear is that it will sit there like this for an extended length of time.