Has it ever been determined what 79-90 were originally? Only thing in Manchester lists that even remotely matches is Atlantic & Pacific 29-38, but even this is only 10. Maybe year or builder are off?
Here is a possibility - Manchester serials 1204-1215. KCC&S 201-212 renumbered 75-86 then 79-90? 1884 not 1882 but otherwise plausible?
I believe that you’re correct. I am away from home and my stack of stuff, and will confirm when I return.
H. K. Vollrath Roster 201 75 4-4-0 KCC&S Manchester 1204 1884 202 76 4-4-0 KCC&S Manchester 1205 1884 203 77 4-4-0 KCC&S Manchester 1206 1884 204 78 4-4-0 KCC&S Manchester 1207 1884 205 79 4-4-0 KCC&S Manchester 1208 1884 206 80 4-4-0 KCC&S Manchester 1209 1884 207 81 4-4-0 KCC&S Manchester 1210 1884 208 82 4-4-0 KCC&S Manchester 1211 1884 209 83 4-4-0 KCC&S Manchester 1212 1884 210 84 4-4-0 KCC&S Manchester 1213 1884 211 85 4-4-0 KCC&S Manchester 1214 1884 212 86 4-4-0 KCC&S Manchester 1215 1884 Frisco 1903 Roster
Hi All, Attached are three years of rosters for 1882-1884 by George Dodson. They show the locos from the early years in the range mentioned. If Andre had similar questions on any other wheel arrangements they should be covered as well. Blessings! Allen Stanley