Frisco Railroad Library Frisco Library

Go Back   Frisco Railroad Library Frisco Library > The Real Frisco > Motive Power > Diesel Locomotives > Diesel General

Diesel General General questions and comments about diesels

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6  
Old 1 Week Ago
meteor910's Avatar
meteor910 meteor910 is offline
2009 Engineer of the Year
Emperor of the North
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Frontenac, MO
Posts: 1,766
meteor910 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: John F. Kirkland Books

FYI - after some delay due to travel, today I finished reading John F. Kirkland's book "The Diesel Builders, Vol 1, Fairbanks-Morse and Lima-Hamilton". Kirkland's books are very detail oriented, lots of data on the engines and transmissions, etc - the kind of stuff I like.

I had always thought the minor diesel builders - Baldwin, F-M, Lima-Hamilton, were overwhelmed by EMD and, to a lesser extent, Alco and later on, GE. I thought EMD and Alco won their leading market share because their stuff was better than that supplied by the other firms.

Not so according to Kirkland (he does have an anti-EMD bias, as he was a Baldwin guy). EMD and Alco won their huge combined market share because - they did indeed build good products, but mainly because they got there first, and thus their products actualy defined the diesel locomotive market. Many of the sales that went to the minority builders were made because EMD and Alco were sold out.

But, per Kirkland, the F-M and Lima designs were very well thought out, were well engineered, and were of high quality - certainly equal to EMD & Alco, and, after the Alco 244 arrived, superior to Alco. The problem was they were late to market, and did not have the production capacity of the big two. Also, EMD F's, E's, NW's, SW's and Alco S's and RS's actualy defined the locomotive types as well.

Baldwin was successful with the VO's - they also got there at the start, but their later types were not successful. F-M and L-H were just plain late to the party.

The Baldwin's, F-M's and Lima's were OK, but suffered maintenance headaches because ..... they were different. And, they were totally outnumbered. The Frisco actually liked their F-M's, but wisely concentrated them around Tulsa so they could build a unique maintenance expertise there.

Kirkland points out the F-M locomotive effort was in the black in total at the time they decided to do other things. He also notes the Lima-Hamilton diesel locomotive plant in Lima, OH was the most efficient production line of any of the builders, and L-H did the best job of using common parts and sub-assemblies in their designs.

A good read! On to volume 2 - Alco. I look forward to his comments about the Alco 244 engine!

Ken

Last edited by meteor910; 1 Week Ago at 03:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
John Marietta Collection, Pittsburg, KS Karl General 4 01-26-2010 05:26 AM
John Hatch Karl Frisco Folks 2 12-17-2009 03:04 PM
John Chambers - Thank You Rick McClellan Announcements 6 09-24-2009 09:29 AM
Surviving Equipment Locations friscomike Surviving Equipment 37 01-16-2009 03:20 PM
John G Hollembeak friscomike Frisco Folks 2 01-13-2009 08:03 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1995-2010