Northern Division - Modeling a KC-Area Interlocking Plant

Discussion in 'Divisions' started by yardmaster, Apr 26, 2011.

  1. yardmaster

    yardmaster Administrator Staff Member Administrator Frisco.org Supporter

    So many towers from which to choose...so little space!

    The progeny and I are a day or so away from setting up benchwork; Olathe will go up first in the new space.

    In the area over and adjacent to the gigantic workbench, there is enough space for a narrow vignette. An interlocking plant would fit perfectly; however, I'm struggling with deciding which one:
    • KCT Tower 4
    • 29th St Tower
    • Rosedale (KY) Tower
    Each of these three locations have been discussed in the forum, and I believe each has advantages. I do want a "modelgenic" location and I think all 3 fit the bill.

    I am leaning toward Tower #4, since it could potentially be both picturesque and functional: it could control both a track leading to a hidden KC Stockyards staging track and the track that leads toward KC Union Station.

    However, I think that 29th Street could also make for MKT interchange traffic.

    Any thoughts from the KC Crew?

    Best Regards,
     
  2. renapper (Richard Napper RIP 3/8/2013)

    renapper (Richard Napper RIP 3/8/2013) Passed away March 8, 2013

    Chris,
    I have scratch built both 29th Street and KY Tower and they are both on my layout. I have not constructed Tower 4. Since it has more windows, tower 29th Street is a little bigger than KY Tower. I can send you the construction article for 29th Street if you are interested. It makes for a neet little tower which does not take up a lot of room.
    Richard
     
  3. klrwhizkid

    klrwhizkid Administrator Staff Member Administrator Frisco.org Supporter

    Based on my recently (since 2009) accumulated knowledge of the Frisco in KC and interconnecting railroads, I would go with Tower 4. Although I don't have the benefit of an overall track plan or theme, I believe that interlock might best serve what I understand are your needs. Think in terms of how Rick McClellan put it to use on his layout.
     
  4. Karl

    Karl 2008 Engineer of the Year Frisco.org Supporter

    Ditto Tower 4, which would offer a greater variety of railroads, which would include your son's favorite, ATSF. Tower 4 would allow you to use pneumatic switch machines.
     
  5. yardmaster

    yardmaster Administrator Staff Member Administrator Frisco.org Supporter

    Gents, thanks very much for the feedback. Admittedly I was biased toward Tower 4 for the strict operational possibilities that it provides, and I supose I was looking for validation more than anything.

    While a Tower 4 scene would be more aesthetic than functional at the start, I would love to have it set up as a fully functioning interlocking with an assigned operator down the road.

    Keith, you make an excellent point: a track plan or layout room diagram would help. I'll try to get one posted soon; I really haven't sketched a new plan bur I am planning on revising the KC Terminal Plan that I'd originally developed for our garage. Howeve, we have more space as I gauge it in the new house.

    Best Regards,
     

Share This Page